The Role of Nrf2 (Nfe2l2) In the Physiological and Biochemical Pathways Underlying Oxidative Stress-Induced Male Infertility

Authors

  • Rasha Hamzah Abdulhussein Department of Physiology, Hammurabi College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Iraq
  • Zahraa Hamid Mohan Al-Gawwam Department of anatomy, Hammurabi College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Iraq
  • Rafid A. Taj-Aldeen Department of Science, College of Basic Education, University of Babylon, Iraq
  • Hameda Abd Almahdi Ghazi Department of Anatomy, Hammurabi College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Iraq

Keywords:

NRF2, Oxidative Stress, Male Infertility, Redox Homeostasis

Abstract

Male infertility related to oxidative stress begins with a severe imbalance between the overwhelming generation of reactive oxygen species and restricted capacity of endogenous antioxidant defenses. A chain reaction is initiated by this oxidative imbalance in structural and functional damages to the sperm, such as peroxidation of lipids in the plasma membrane, oxidative modifications to proteins, mitochondrial dysfunction, and fragmentation to both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Such molecular damages motility of sperm reduce fluidity in membranes and general fertility thus leads ultimately reduces reproductive success. NRF2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) has been described as a master regulator in controlling cellular antioxidant responses and hence playing central protective roles against oxidative stresses. In conditions of oxidation NRF2 separates from its cytoplasmic repressor Keap1 moves to nucleus binds on ARE then induces transcription detoxification as well as antioxidant genes including HO-1 heme oxygenase-1 NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase -1 superoxide dismutase glutathione peroxidase. It is this signaling pathway that maintains redox homeostasis and protection against cellular damage induced by ROS. On the other hand, impaired NRF2 activation or polymorphisms in the NFE2L2 gene have been associated with increased oxidative stress as well as increased sperm DNA damage and decreased sperm quality. Therefore, elucidating the NRF2 signaling cascade provides a promising approach for developing targeted diagnostic markers and therapeutic interventions. Future strategies may include combining NRF2 activity assessment with advanced redox biomarkers and personalized antioxidant therapy to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of male infertility caused by oxidative stress, thereby providing more precise and effective reproductive healthcare solutions.

References

Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., & Halabi, J. (2019). Proteomics, oxidative stress and male infertility. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 29(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.04.009

Alahmar, A. T. (2019). Role of oxidative stress in male infertility: an updated review. World Journal of Men's Health, 37(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.180043

Agarwal, A., Virk, G., Ong, C., & du Plessis, S. S. (2019). Role of oxidative stress in male infertility: An updated review. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 12(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_150_18

Aitken, R. J. (2022). Oxidative stress in the male germ line: causes, consequences and control. Antioxidants, 11(2), 306. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020306

Aydos, Ö. S., Türkmen, Ö., & Güney, M. (2021). Association between functional Nrf2 gene promoter polymorphism (−617 C>A) and sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 38(3), 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2021.1972359

Aydos, Ş., Uluğ, M., Demir, R., & colleagues. (2021). Relationship between functional Nrf2 gene promoter polymorphism and sperm DNA damage in male infertility. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 67(6), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2021.1972359

Barati, E., Moghbelinejad, S., Hosseini, S., & Rashidieh, B. (2019). Oxidative stress and male infertility: current knowledge. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 76(7), 1829–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2985-y

Dutta, S. (2022). Antioxidant paradox in male infertility: A blind eye on reductive stress. Antioxidants, 11(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11010167

El‑Sayed, S. M., Abdel‑Aziz, A. M., & colleagues. (2023). The regulatory effects of JAK2/STAT3 on spermatogenesis and the redox Keap1/Nrf2 axis in an animal model of testicular ischemia reperfusion injury. Cells, 12(18), 2292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12182292

Gharagozloo, P., & Aitken, R. J. (2011). The role of sperm oxidative stress in male infertility and the significance of antioxidant therapy. Human Reproduction, 26(7), 1628–1639. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der256

Itoh, K., Chiba, T., Takahashi, S., Ishii, T., Igarashi, K., Katoh, Y., ... & Yamamoto, M. (1997). An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 236(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1997.6943

Kaltsas, A. (2023). Oxidative stress and male infertility: The protective role of antioxidants. Medicina, 59(10), 1769. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101769

La Vignera, S., Condorelli, R. A., & colleagues. (2024). Redox homeostasis and Nrf2‑regulated mechanisms are relevant to male infertility. Antioxidants, 13(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13020193

Li, X., Chen, Y., & colleagues. (2021). Nrf2 activation mediates the protection of mouse Sertoli cells under acute heat stress conditions. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 528, 111246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2021.111246

Long, M., Dong, S., & colleagues. (2021). The role of NRF2/KEAP1 signaling pathway in cancer metabolism (includes overview of NRF2 target gene networks relevant to redox biology). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(9), 4376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094376

Ma, Q. (2013). Role of Nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 53, 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140320

Mannucci, A., Argento, F. R., Fini, E., Coccia, M. E., Taddei, N., Becatti, M., & Fiorillo, C. (2022). The impact of oxidative stress in male infertility. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 8, 799294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.799294

Nakamura, B. N., Lawson, G., Chan, J. Y., & Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. (2010). Knockout of the transcription factor Nrf2 disrupts spermatogenesis in an age‑dependent manner. Biology of Reproduction, 82(3), 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.079855

Pavuluri, H., Çiftci, O., & Sengupta, P. (2024). Oxidative stress-associated male infertility: therapeutic options and future perspectives. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-04871-5

Rehman, B., Rahim, A., Afzal, M., Tazarrat, A., Kashif, H., & Qayyum, S. (2022). Association of Nrf2 gene polymorphism (rs6721961) with semen parameters in primary male infertility cases in a Pakistani population. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 72(2), 398–402.

Taguchi, K., & Yamamoto, M. (2012). The Keap1–Nrf2 system in cancers: Stress response and anabolic metabolism (mechanistic overview applicable to reproductive tissues). Frontiers in Oncology, 2, 200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2012.00200

Wang, Y., Fu, X., & Li, H. (2025). Mechanisms of oxidative stress‑induced sperm dysfunction. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 16, 1520835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1520835

Zhang, M., Jiang, X., & colleagues. (2014). Scrotal heat induces an Nrf2‑driven antioxidant response during oxidative stress and apoptosis in the mouse testis. Journal of Thermal Biology, 44, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.06.003

Zhou, Y., Smith, F., & Patel, D. (2025). Deciphering the role of oxidative stress in male infertility. Frontiers in Reproductive Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.822257

Zhou, Y., Yu, X., & colleagues. (2015). Variations in antioxidant genes and male infertility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(9), 22376–22395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160922376

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28