Phosphate-Buffered RMGIC Liner Under Pediatric Class II Composites: Clinical Sensitivity & Inflammatory Biomarkers
Keywords:
Phosphate-buffered RMGIC, Pediatric dentistry, Class II composite, Post-operative sensitivity, Electric pulp testing, Inflammatory biomarkers, Primary molars, Bioactive linerAbstract
Background: Post-operative sensitivity after pediatric Class II composites is frequent and relates to polymerization stress and transient inflammation. A phosphate-buffered resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) liner may stabilize pH, limit inflammation, and improve comfort.
Objective: To compare a phosphate-buffered RMGIC liner with a conventional RMGIC liner under Class II composites in primary molars.
Methods: Randomized, controlled clinical study of fifty children, each contributing one tooth per group (buffered vs conventional). Standardized isolation, preparation, selective-etch bonding, and incremental composite placement were used. Outcomes: pain by 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Wong–Baker FACES at 1 and 4 weeks; electric pulp testing (EPT) at baseline and 4 weeks; gingival crevicular fluid interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) at baseline, 1 and 4 weeks; 1-week chewing function; 48-hour analgesic use; and 3-month marginal staining. Per table footnotes, between-group comparisons used independent samples t-tests for continuous outcomes and chi-square tests for proportions/categories.
Results: Baseline demographics were comparable. NRS pain favored buffering at 1 week (1.83±1.33 vs 3.78±1.80; p<0.001) and 4 weeks (0.69±0.71 vs 1.93±1.03; p<0.001); Wong–Baker differences were nonsignificant. EPT thresholds were higher with buffering at 4 weeks (32.60±5.43 vs 27.58±4.54; p=0.001). IL-6 was lower with buffering at 1 week (8.58±3.42 vs 12.00±4.76; p=0.005) and 4 weeks (6.78±2.29 vs 10.21±5.21; p=0.004); TNF-α was lower at 4 weeks (8.13±3.28 vs 14.48±5.40; p<0.001). PGE₂ differences were nonsignificant. Chewing function was better at 1 week (7.68±2.06 vs 11.80±3.98; p<0.001). Fewer children required analgesics within 48 hours (20% vs 40%; p=0.039) and fewer doses were taken (0.27±0.56 vs 0.96±1.08; p=0.006). At 3 months, marginal staining distributions were similar (p=0.538).
Conclusions: Compared with a conventional RMGIC, the phosphate-buffered RMGIC liner reduced early pain, attenuated inflammatory biomarkers, improved pulpal sensibility, and enhanced short-term function without compromising restoration integrity. These child-centered benefits support biologically informed liner selection and justify longer follow-up to confirm clinical long-term durability and survival.
References
Abdelsamie, E., Abdalla, A., & Salama, M. (2024). The effect of flowable composite and glass ionomer liner on the marginal integrity of class II composite resin restorations. Tanta Dental Journal. 21(2):p 208-215. https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_3_24.
Ahmed, B., Wafaie, R., Hamama, H., & Mahmoud, S. (2024). 3-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of posterior composite restorations lined with ion-releasing materials. Scientific Reports, 14 , 4942. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55329-6.
Arandi, N. (2020). Pulp protection protocols under posterior composite restorations: A survey of dentists in Palestine. Saudi Endodontic Journal, 10, 15 - 20. https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_146_18.
Aye, T., Polkit, S., Klaijan, I., Nachanok, K., Salil, L., & Pasutha, T. (2023). Acemannan-containing bioactive resin modified glass ionomer demonstrates satisfactory physical and biological properties. Journal of Dental Sciences, 19, 1061 - 1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2023.06.009.
Bhatt, R., Patel, M., Bhatt, R., Patel, C., Joshi, K., & Makwani, D. (2023). A comparative evaluation of light cure calcium silicate and resin-modified glass ionomer as indirect pulp capping agent in primary molars: A randomized clinical trial. Dental Research Journal, 20. (1):18 https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.369620.
Bulut, M., & Ulusoy, A. (2021). The variability of electric pulp response thresholds in primary molars: a clinical study. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 22, 693 - 697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-021-00608-3.
Datta, S., Suprabha, B., Suman, E., Shenoy, R., Rao, A., & Nandita, K. (2019). Effect of liner on the marginal integrity of resin composite restorations after selective caries excavation: An In Vitro study. European Journal of General Dentistry, 8, 29 - 35. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejgd.ejgd_22_19.
Deng, F., Kitagawa, H., Kohno, T., Wu, T., Funayama, N., Thongthai, P., Li, H., Abe, G. L., Kitagawa, R., Sasaki, J.-I., & Imazato, S. (2024). Fabrication of Rapidly Soluble Zn2+-Releasing Phosphate-Based Glass and Its Incorporation into Dental Resin. Molecules, 29(21), 5098. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29215098
Fahmy, M., Mosaa, T., & Abdelarouf, R. (2021). Evaluation of Ion Release, Apatite Formation and Tooth-Restoration Interface of Bioactive Resin Composite Versus Conventional Resin Composite; An In Vitro Study. Egyptian Dental Journal. 67(2), 1463-1473. https://doi.org/10.21608/EDJ.2021.53706.1409.
Ge, K., Lam, W., Chu, C., & Yu, O. (2024). Updates on the clinical application of glass ionomer cement in restorative and preventive dentistry. Journal of Dental Sciences, 19, S1 - S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2024.07.021.
Hengtrakool, C., Wanichpakorn, S., & Kedjarune-Leggat, U. (2023). Chitosan Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Epidermal Growth Factor Promotes Pulp Cell Proliferation with a Minimum Effect on Fluoride and Aluminum Release. Polymers, 15(17), 3511. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173511
Ionescu, A. C., Hahnel, S., Chiari, M. D. S., König, A., Delvecchio, P., Braga, R. R., Zambelli, V., & Brambilla, E. (2022). TEGDMA-Functionalized Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate Resin-Based Composites Prevent Secondary Caries in an In Vitro Biofilm Model. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 13(4), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13040232
Koubi, S., Elmerini, H., Koubi, G., Tassery, H., & Camps, J. (2011). Quantitative Evaluation by Glucose Diffusion of Microleakage in Aged Calcium Silicate-Based Open-Sandwich Restorations. International Journal of Dentistry, 2012, , 105863. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/105863.
Krishnakumar, K., Kalaskar, R., Kalaskar, A., Bhadule, S., & Joshi, S. (2024). Clinical Effectiveness of High-viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin as a Restorative Material in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 17, 221 - 228. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2757.
Mathias, M., Rathi, N., Bendgude, V., Tirupathi, S., Chauhan, R., Borde, A., Lath, T., & Shah, S. (2023). Comparative Fluoride Ion Release Pre and Postrecharge Situations among Three Different Pediatric Dental Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 15, 729 - 735. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2461.
Messer-Hannemann, P., Samadi, M., Böttcher, H., Duy, S., Duy, D., Albrecht, N., Schwendicke, F., & Effenberger, S. (2023). Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading. Dental Materials.39(1), e46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.08.093.
Miotti, L., Vissotto, C., De Nardin, L., De Andrades Manjabosco, B., Tuchtenhagen, S., Münchow, E., & Emmanuelli, B. (2023). Does the liner material influence pulpal vitality in deep carious cavities submitted to selective caries removal? A network meta-analysis review. Clinical Oral Investigations, 27, 7143 - 7156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05372-w.
Noor, R., Aslam, S., Memon, A., Ali, I., Zaidi, H., & Ali, A. (2024). Electric Pulp Test Threshold Responses in Healthy Mature Permanent Teeth. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.5(9), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i09.1901.
Opdam, N., VanBeek, V., VanBeek, W., Loomans, B., Pereira-Cenci, T., Cenci, M., & Laske, M. (2023). Long term clinical performance of 'open sandwich' and 'total-etch' Class II composite resin restorations showing proximal deterioration of glass-ionomer cement.. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 39(9), 800-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.07.001.
Parakh, S. (2021). An In-Vitro Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Microleakage in Class II Open-Sandwich Restorations Using Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement & Zirconomer. European Journal of Translational and Clinical Medicine. 7. 8516-8524.
Patankar V R, Jain A K, Rao R, et al. (February 10, 2025) Effect of Liners on Pulpal Outcome After Partial Caries Removal in Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 17(2): e78831. doi:10.7759/cureus.78831
Pérez-Castro, B., Flores-Ledesma, A., Rubio-Rosas, E., Teutle-Coyotecatl, B., Flores-Ferreyra, B., Argueta-Figueroa, L., & Moyaho-Bernal, M. (2024). Comparison of the physical properties of glass ionomer modified with silver phosphate/hydroxyapatite or titanium dioxide nanoparticles: in vitro study.. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 48 4, 160-167 . https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.089.
Rodrigues, M., Da Cunha, L., Vilela, A., Schettini, A., Bragança, G., França, R., & Soares, C. (2021). Selective carious tissue removal and glass ionomer liner reduction of pulp stress in bulk fill resin composite restorations.. Brazilian oral research, 35, e119 . https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0119.
Romoozi, E., Salehian, M., Sahabi, M., Sattari, M., & Kamali, E. (2020). The Effect of Resin and Zinc Phosphate Cements on the Induction of IL6. Entomology and Applied Science Letters , 6(4), 25-29. https://easletters.com/article/yor7-the-effect-of-resin-and-zinc-phosphate-cements-on-the-induction-of-il6
Schmidlin, P., Huber, T., Göhring, T., Attin, T., & Bindl, A. (2008). Effects of total and selective bonding on marginal adaptation and microleakage of Class I resin composite restorations in vitro.. Operative dentistry, 33 6, 629-35 . https://doi.org/10.2341/07-158.
Shekh, T., Kumar, P., Kumar, Y., Pathak, K., Punia, S., & Patnana, A. (2024). Microleakage of Class II Posterior Composite Restorations with and Without use of Liners - A Comparative Study.. Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research. 35(2):p 176-180. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_973_23.
Shenvi S., Aulakh B.K., Oswal P., Khaitan A., Praveen A., Jadhav K.R. The role of lining materials in minimizing microleakage in class I cavities restored with nanohybrid composites: an in vitro study lining materials and microleakage in nanohybrid restorations. Endodontics Today. 2025;23(1):15-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0064
Tuygunov, N., Khairunnisa, Z., Yahya, N., Aziz, A., Zakaria, M., Israilova, N., & Cahyanto, A. (2024). Bioactivity and remineralization potential of modified glass ionomer cement: A systematic review of the impact of calcium and phosphate ion release.. Dental materials journal.43(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2023-132.
Vural, K., Gökalp, S., & Kiremitçi, A. (2016). Clinical Performance of Composite Restorations with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Lining in Root Surface Carious Lesions.. Operative dentistry, 41 3, 268-75 . https://doi.org/10.2341/15-205-C.
Yan, W., Yang, F., Liu, Z., Wen, Q., Gao, Y., Niu, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Anti-Inflammatory and Mineralization Effects of an ASP/PLGA-ASP/ACP/PLLA-PLGA Composite Membrane as a Dental Pulp Capping Agent. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 13(3), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030106.
